Felipe Dreer vs Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Nov at 03:56 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
F. Dreer vs L. Emanuel Ambrogi

ARG
0
Win
Played
1
Win

ARG
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Dreer 0 - 1 Ambrogi
They have played 2 sets in total, with Felipe Dreer winning 0 and Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi winning 2. The last match between Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi and Felipe Dreer was at the M15 Azul, 13-11-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dreer | 0 |
| Ambrogi | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Azul(11-13-25)
F. Dreer vs L. E. Ambrogi H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.33% (21-15) | Career Total W/L | 60.24% (153-101) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 0 | Titles | 2 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
F. Dreer vs L. E. Ambrogi Match Preview:
- Looking at recent second serve performance, Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi holds a slight advantage with a 45.12% success rate compared to Felipe Dreer's 42.99%. How significant is this difference? Given its high correlation with match outcomes, it could be a key factor.
- In terms of return game statistics, Felipe Dreer has the upper hand, winning 50.23% of points on opponents' second serves, compared to Ambrogi’s 47.21%. Will this edge turn the tide in Dreer's favor?
- Examining the players' ability to return first serves, Dreer again performs slightly better at 36.14% compared to Ambrogi’s 33.58%.
- When under pressure, particularly at breakpoints, Dreer and Ambrogi have nearly identical performances, saving 52.87% and 52.40% respectively.
- Reviewing overall match performance over the past year, Dreer leads with a win rate of 60.00%, while Ambrogi is at 53.73%. Could Dreer's consistency translate to victory here?
- Both players excel on clay, each with a 61% career win rate on this surface. However, Ambrogi shows a particular vulnerability on hard surfaces with only a 20% win rate.
- Felipe Dreer has primarily competed at Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments and has a higher win percentage (60.00%) than Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi, who competes more on the Challengers/ITF circuit with a 45.00% win rate.
- Regarding opponent strength over the last year, Dreer has faced significantly higher-ranked players, with an average rank of 121.71 compared to Ambrogi's opponents’ average of 341.33. Does this suggest Dreer is battle-tested?
- Deciding set performance shows Dreer as being more clutch, winning 64% of these scenarios, while Ambrogi achieves victory in only 40% of deciding sets.
- In terms of breakpoint conversion, Ambrogi has a slight edge, converting 39.15% of opportunities, just ahead of Dreer’s 38.36%.
Editorial Prediction (November 13, 2025, UTC):
Assessing recent performances, Felipe Dreer seems to possess the necessary attributes to come out on top in the impending match against Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi. Dreer's overall match win rate over the past year and his ability to compete against stronger opposition provides him with a significant advantage.
Although Ambrogi has a marginally better second serve success rate, Dreer’s superior performance on return games suggests he could be more effective at capitalizing on Ambrogi’s serves. Dreer’s competence in deciding sets further implies a psychological edge in crucial moments.
While both players share a proficiency on clay, Dreer's experience from facing higher-ranked opponents might offer him the resilience required to handle pressure situations better than Ambrogi.
Based on these analyses, Felipe Dreer is likely to emerge victorious in this matchup.
Felipe Dreer vs Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
F. Dreer vs L. E. Ambrogi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 8 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:31:36 | Average Match Time | 1:31:36 |
| 68% (43/63) | 1st Serve % | 59% (26/44) |
| 63% (27/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (20/26) |
| 30% (6/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 67% (12/18) |
| 100% (2/2) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (4/10) |
| 27% (12/44) | Return Points Win % | 48% (30/63) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
F. Dreer Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-3 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | ||
Q3 | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-7(5) 6-3 10-6 | ||
L. E. Ambrogi Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | W | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 3-6 6-0 | ||
Q1 | L | 3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | ||

F. Dreer vs L. E. Ambrogi Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.33% (21/15) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.24% (153/101) |
| 54.65% (47/39) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.67% (345/243) |
| 52.13% (453/416) | Games Win/Loss | 53.76% (2992/2573) |
| 0% (0/0) | Hard Win/Loss | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 58.82% (20/14) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.04% (152/97) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 5 | Aces Total | 444 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 47 | Total Double Faults | 475 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:46:7 |
| 130.78 | Average Opponent Rank | 187.02 |
| 71% (740/1037) | 1st Serve % | 66% (10715/16189) |
| 62% (460/740) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (6972/10715) |
| 41% (122/297) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2695/5474) |
| 43% (54/125) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (825/1791) |
| 44% (449/1009) | Return Points Win % | 43% (6908/16115) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 50.57% (44/43) |
| 58.33% (21/15) | Futures W/L | 65.27% (109/58) |
| 58% (21/36) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (152/253) |
| 63% (5/8) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (36/70) |
| 64% (9/14) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (41/81) |
| 89% (18/16) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (145/130) |
| 11% (18/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (145/15) |
| 28% (18/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (109/22) |